We deliver a lot of product to customers in Tucson everyday, except Monday. Our semi-trailer is nearly full for the trip down each night. The trailer on Monday night, because of the deferred load from no Monday deliveries, is always very full. It often requires manual loading and unloading to get everything into the trailer. If it doesn't fit, the only alternative is to call for a second trailer and pay the higher cost. The second trailer, being unplanned, costs significantly more than the first trailer, so the line haul cost more than doubles that day.
An associate submitted a SPIN idea to stock a second sku of copy paper at our Tucson cross dock. We've been stocking one item for years, our best seller. But a branding shift has happened in recent years and that best seller has been losing sales to a new copy paper item, which is shipped via the nightly trailer.
An adjustment was made to reduce the amount of product from the original sku to be stocked in Tucson, and replace that product with the new paper sku. Although we stock no more paper on the floor in Tucson, we now have the two top skus represented. Pallet volume on the trailer has declined and productivity in the warehouse has increased. It is easier to send the labels than it is to select the pallet of paper and load them into the truck. The Tucson team also receives a time-saving benefit because they no longer need to unload the paper from the trailer. It is already on their floor.
This asociate idea is expected to save $3,600 annually in transportation and loading expenses. Congratulations to the team for an excellent idea and successful implementation!
Friday, June 26, 2009
Friday, May 29, 2009
Warehouse Consolidation
In November of 2008, we closed a satellite warehouse facility of 40,000 square feet. The soft economy and improvements in our inventory management allowed us to consolidate most of the product into our main warehouse building. However, we had too much floor stack product and not enough floor stack space, so we took a temporary rental space from a neighbor around the corner from us. This 5,500 square feet of space was for floor stacked products from only two vendors.
While the monthly savings was terrific, we wanted to achive more and get everything into one building. A Kaizen team was formed and options were discussed. There were a variety of innovative solutions determined by the team and implemented to great success.
In the end, specific furniture racking zones were created. Product profiling was conducted to keep similar products near each other. Racking was modified to create additional floor stack space within the racking. Profile changes were made to our existing floor stack area to include additional products and to move lighter products into racking and heavier furniture items into our limited floor space. Cost savings for this project exceeded $38,500 annually!
Thursday, April 23, 2009
The SPIN Zone!
Specific Process Improvement Needed (SPIN). These are the ideas that our associates have while working on the job. Ideas that improve safety, reduce cycle time, improve accuracy, or drive cost out of our operation. Some SPIN ideas make improvements but demonstrate no measureable dollar savings. Other ideas generate deep savings.
SPIN ideas are submitted to our four location LEAN Captains. They meet once a week to review all new ideas and to follow up on the progress of projects underway. Interestingly, the management team does not participate in this process, except to provide some meeting facilitation support and to provide resources as needed. The LEAN Captains decide the priority, based on the impact to the location.
The SPIN Zone was created to explain the SPIN process to all associates. People can also obtain a status update anytime by visiting the detail on the board. Every SPIN idea is recorded and tracked through the SPIN system, with weekly updates posted on the SPIN board. Completed SPIN ideas are printed and posted in a binder that contains all ideas are completion and the 30-day review. Our goal is 120 ideas in 2009. We are a bit behind that pace currently, but we are tracking to process nearly 100 ideas. Improvements have been significant and associates are beginning to feel empowered!
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Lego Fun for All !
Phoenix conducted "Lego Training" for all associates last week. This 4-hour training exercise was conducted in three different sessions to allow all associates an opportunity to participate. This training simulates order fulfillment in our warehouse environment. Each group had an opportunity to run the same simulation three times, but were allowed to make improvements between simulations. As expected, every group dramatically improved their performance in each simulation. The improvement from the baseline simulation to the final was dramatic!
Trainees learned about process mapping and practical ways to apply Lean Thinking in their work areas. They used spaghetti diagrams to identify and reduce motion. They applied 5S in their work areas. They applied visual controls. They redesigned work areas and operational floor layouts. Between simulations, they received instructions on some new tools, then had the chance to apply those tools, and others they already knew, on the simulated work floor. They had limits and time constraints, just like real life! They discussed ideas and found ways to implement the ideas with greatest impact.
In the end, most associates found the training to be helpful in understanding Lean Thinking. But more importantly, they learned new ways of how to apply Lean in their work areas. In addition, it became obvious that Lean becomes much more impactful in the work place when associates share their good ideas and understanding of our functions with each other and their leaders. What may be obvious to them is sometimes overlooked by those who don't work that job every single day!
Monday, March 23, 2009
PowerMax Inbound Kaizen
The first week of March found a Kaizen event in Phoenix going full speed. Subject matter experts were assembled from Las Vegas, Los Angeles and Phoenix to participate on a Kaizen team guided by our illustrious Lean Master!
Some items that are needed and ordered in full carton quantities cannot always be delivered in full cartons. This condition requires a great deal of extra work in the receiving department. When there are 360 widgets on the order, and there are 120 widgets per carton, receiving three full cartons takes much less time than having to count every widget when they come loose in 2-5 repacked cartons. So the team looked at what can be done to receive more in full cartons and how do we streamline receiving when the order arrives in repacked cartons.
The group recommended ASN receiving, developed a pallet lane concept for staging products to be put away, redesigned receiving carts, among other tasks. Their findings were significant, with an expected savings of $9,500 per year in annual time savings and these expected savings have already begun to be realized in the receiving department! The 30-day RASIC chart is under current review.
Tuesday, November 25, 2008
Satellite Building Relocated
Due to the soft Arizona economy, our facility has relocated our furniture building into a much smaller space. In the distribution world, more space isn't always better than less space. In our case, we were able to make several improvements in our process through relocation.
First, we moved more product into our primary building. This translates to a higher percentage of orders being filled from our primary building and improves our productivity rates. We will spend less time off site at the satellite building and there will be less time spent driving between the two buildings because only one trip per shift will be required.
Second, the new building is much closer to our primary building. Our previous satellite building was 15 minutes away, so 30 minutes was spent daily driving for each trip. The new facility is 3 minutes away, so 6 minutes for each trip. Obviously, there is a gain of 24 minutes per trip, with two associates in the truck, for a gain of 0.8 labor hours per trip.
Couple those results with the reduction of one trip on average per night and the labor savings is 1.8 hours per day or just over 450 labor hours per year! That is equal to gaining a full time associate for 11 weeks at no cost! This is LEAN at its best, a true reduction of transportation waste!
Third, because we have much less space, we pay a lot less for that space. Our rent expense for off-site space will decline by nearly 80%, a very significant savings.
So we spend less money and increase warehouse productivity at the same time. These are the gains we look for all the time with LEAN production!
First, we moved more product into our primary building. This translates to a higher percentage of orders being filled from our primary building and improves our productivity rates. We will spend less time off site at the satellite building and there will be less time spent driving between the two buildings because only one trip per shift will be required.
Second, the new building is much closer to our primary building. Our previous satellite building was 15 minutes away, so 30 minutes was spent daily driving for each trip. The new facility is 3 minutes away, so 6 minutes for each trip. Obviously, there is a gain of 24 minutes per trip, with two associates in the truck, for a gain of 0.8 labor hours per trip.
Couple those results with the reduction of one trip on average per night and the labor savings is 1.8 hours per day or just over 450 labor hours per year! That is equal to gaining a full time associate for 11 weeks at no cost! This is LEAN at its best, a true reduction of transportation waste!
Third, because we have much less space, we pay a lot less for that space. Our rent expense for off-site space will decline by nearly 80%, a very significant savings.
So we spend less money and increase warehouse productivity at the same time. These are the gains we look for all the time with LEAN production!
T-Outs Kaizen Team
In theory, inventory on hand for a given item should always be accurately reflected in the computer inventory file. Inaccuracies can cause us to either carry more inventory than we need for a given item, or to disappoint a customer by not being able to fill an order we thought we could fill. From a LEAN perspective, both are problems to be corrected by tightening processes to maintain strong inventory control. If we have 100 widgets on the shelf, our computer system should say we have 100 widgets as well.
Several times per day, our computer system communicates to our customers that we have an item in stock, but it is not available on the shelf when the warehouse associate goes to pick the item for the order. This situation is called a T-Out in Phoenix, and our objective is to have as few as possible. In October and November, our T-Out rate in Phoenix was too high at 0.13%. Our target is 0.10%.
During the 3rd week of November, we gathered a Kaizen team to look at our T-Outs and see if we could bring them down below our target. The team included six associates, two from inventory control, two from the receiving and put away shift, and two from the order fulfillment shift. They determined there are four significant opportunities for improvement that, if improved, will reduce T-Outs in Phoenix. Those key opportunities are Housekeeping, Pick Accuracy, Product Astray, Low Stock on Hand. The team created a RASIC chart with all action items to improve each area, a person assigned as responsible, and a completion date. We expect to see a 40% reduction in T-Outs, beginning as early as late December.
Several times per day, our computer system communicates to our customers that we have an item in stock, but it is not available on the shelf when the warehouse associate goes to pick the item for the order. This situation is called a T-Out in Phoenix, and our objective is to have as few as possible. In October and November, our T-Out rate in Phoenix was too high at 0.13%. Our target is 0.10%.
During the 3rd week of November, we gathered a Kaizen team to look at our T-Outs and see if we could bring them down below our target. The team included six associates, two from inventory control, two from the receiving and put away shift, and two from the order fulfillment shift. They determined there are four significant opportunities for improvement that, if improved, will reduce T-Outs in Phoenix. Those key opportunities are Housekeeping, Pick Accuracy, Product Astray, Low Stock on Hand. The team created a RASIC chart with all action items to improve each area, a person assigned as responsible, and a completion date. We expect to see a 40% reduction in T-Outs, beginning as early as late December.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)